The next time I look in the dictionary to define the term “Incompetence” – I want to see a picture of BP’s logo there. Seriously. First they cause probably the biggest oil spill in history just out of pure procrastination and irresponsibility, then — instead of running to seal the oil leak like their ass was on fire — they went ahead and let the oil geyser spill some more oil until they decided to nuke the damn thing. Thankfully, they reconsidered and proceeded to try a number of different caps on the oil leak like it was a hat party. I honestly don’t know how many so far, I try to avoid all news pertaining to the oil spill because it pisses me off, but I unavoidably have to watch the other news (I like to stay paranoid knowing that virtually anything can unleash WW3) and every time I tune in for the news I bump into: “BP fits new cap on oil spill” how many caps have this guys fit so far!? can anyone tell me? If that is not blatant incompetence, then we can safely put Dr. Evil from Austin Powers in charge of Chernobyl a Nuclear Power Plant.
On the other hand, what if instead shear incompetence, BP’s oil spill was something intentional, Something evil: A crafty scheme to take over the world! What if the people behind the disaster had something to gain?

Hit the break to find out more.

Anyone with an IQ above moron knows that oil companies such as BP have engineers working on various contingency plans of stopping oil gushers, well before the well is dug. The Gulf of Mexico well explosion and subsequent free flowing crude oil from the severed pipe is no exception. Plans for containment in a similar scenario were surely studied and planned out long before the actual disaster happened.

This line of thinking would suggest that the powers involved knew ahead of time just how to stop the leak and simply let it go on for as long as it did because they wanted it to.

But what is to be gained from such a criminal act? Well, one has to examine the whole picture both from the stand point of what would be gained for BP and perhaps the Federal Government.

From the oil company’s view they stand to gain from being permitted to drill for oil in countries previously off limits to them such as Libya. Such an endeavor was signed during the Gulf Disaster in which BP plans to drill off the coast of Libya soon. Cheaper for them and more profitable since the costs would be a fraction of that here in the U.S.

The part about BP being perfectly capable of stopping the spill from the beginning makes total sense, but what I don’t understand is why would the world let BP drill anywhere else in the planet after the disastrous job they did at the gulf of Mexico!? WHY IN THE HELL WOULD LIBYA LET BP ANYWHERE NEAR THEIR COASTS!?!? Maybe they like pollution. I can almost imagine the phonecall: “Hello, BP? Oh hi! our coasts are all nice and clean, could you come over and f*** them up?”

The U.S. Federal Government also gets what they wanted in the form of perhaps swaying the American public into finally accepting Climate Change/Cap and Trade bill. The Feds have allowed the ruinization the environment of the entire U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast in an elaborate show for those people who disagree with Climate Change/Cap and Trade. This BP disaster was allowed to go on for as long as it did to allow the greatest environmental disaster in history as an example to the American people for the need to get away from energy produced from crude oil.

That does make a lot of sense. I mean, if it wasn’t because of BP, I would be still driving my car to work using gasoline, but instead, I drive my car to work using gasoline! Yes, I still drive my hyper-contaminating VW Beetle from home to work, I feel like a piece of shit for doing it, but I still need to move around the city and can’t afford a hybrid car (Plus, I think that they are royally gay). I also hate public transportation. Have you ever actually been inside of a bus of the public transportation system? The air stench you breathe inside is a foul mixture of armpit, groin, ass and urine! It’s like mustard gas!
Anyway, my point is, that the gulf oil disaster did open my eyes, and the eyes of a lot of people, but we still depend on petroleum no matter what. If they want us to switch to something else they need to come up with a good substitute (or stop suppressing alternative fuels).

It’s amazing the lengths those involved with the idea of a NWO will go to in order to get the public to agree with their agenda. The oil gusher is presented to us simply as an example to persuade the public that getting away from the use of crude oil is necessary for the survival of not only humans, but all species.
We see the evidence every day in the fact that the press isn’t allowed near the area and the presence of the military in the Gulf States. The military helps to control what the public sees and hears about what’s going on is but another item of proof that we are being lied to concerning the facts surrounding the initial well explosion and the subsequent damage leading to the leak itself.

That is also true, as we learned before, BP bought all the keywords from google that led to the gulf oil leak and you can try and google “BP” or “BP oil leak”, and all you will get is search results related to their retarded efforts to stop the spill, which by now are almost as damaging for their image as  the articles that criticize them.

So what do you think? blatant incompetency or hidden agenda? I think it’s a bit of both, maybe they really messed up, but then they saw the opportunity and took it.

Click HERE visit ufodigest.com to read the article in its full extent while I try to develop a new fuel for my VW Beetle. Perhaps water. Yes, water from the gulf of Mexico.

Image courtesy of Flickr user jazzcat60